Horner’s “The Roots of Modern Writing
Instruction: Eighteenth- and Nineteenth Century Britain” explores writing
pedagogies pioneered and fostered in the Scottish universities, and identifies
three key figures as having a lasting impact on future writing instruction:
Edward Edmonstone Aytoun, Alexander Bain, and George Jardine (41). I
would like to focus specifically on Bain in my reflection today, he of the
ironic name, who arguably left us with the bane of the modes model—and perhaps by
extension, the five-paragraph essay.
Bain taught during a time of changing university
populations: younger students, less traditionally prepared than former classes,
and more prone to “rusticisms” that were unacceptable within the framework of
the cultivated, London-standard English (Horner 41). In response,
Bain came up with a counter-measure pedagogy; according to Horner, he is
“generally credited with originating the 'modes of discourse' which he
delineated as narration, description, exposition, argument, and poetry”
(41). Above all else, Bain’s pedagogy stressed the importance of
grammar through repetition and drill. While Horner notes that this “mode of
teaching was as unpopular for his nineteenth-century students as his methods
are with twentieth-century composition theorists” (41), in my experience the
legacy of this paradigm can still be found in educational spaces, particularly
in classrooms that adhere to current-traditional paradigms.
Years ago, during my own undergraduate career, I
took a course that followed the modes model of instruction. Our
syllabus was divided into units named for Bain’s modes: a narrative unit, an
exposition unit, argument, everything but poetry. I later came to
identify this class as following certain elements of the current-traditional
model as well, which in my understanding can be characterized via the following
criteria:
· A
focus on the written product as opposed to writing process
· Formulaic
organization – i.e., the five-paragraph essay
· Assignment
of topics
· Concern
with mechanics, style
This course did stress the importance of
revision, drafting, and pre-writing, so I would not classify it as an exact
mirror of Bain or the current-traditional model. However, I think the point stands that elements
of Bain's modes do survive today despite the challenges of modern theorists,
and I would suggest that one can observe the impact of the modes model in
high-stakes genres like nationwide writing assessment testing. I find it
interesting that, of the three innovators of the Scottish system-- Aytoun,
Bain, and Jardine—it is Bain’s pedagogy that was so widely adopted into the
American composition classroom, and wonder what would have happened if we never
experimented with themes or the five-paragraph essay or current-traditional
pedagogy at all, and started immediately with someone like Jardine, who focused
on peer evaluation and writing as a way of learning (Horner 41)?
Question for Discussion
I wonder: are we living in a post-modes
pedagogical landscape? My experience suggests we are not, but perhaps I am an
anomaly.
The rhetoric-vs.modes pedagogy is still mixed. For example, two of my alma mater(s?), Casper College and Montana State University-Billings still rely heavily on modal ped. My former comp instructor also reports that at least some community colleges in VA base instruction in modes. I don't know how representative that sample is, but I suspect that you're not an anomaly.
ReplyDelete