James Kinneavy—“Expressive Discourse”
(p. 372-86)
In this fascinating and insightful
essay, Kinneavy argues that all discourse (whether intentionally by speakers or
not), is grounded in expressive components. Discussing the important work of
existentialists and phenomenologists in relation to expressionism, Kinneavy
states that the failure of English scholars to acknowledge the value of
expressionism “is certainly a symptom, if not an effect, of the impersonality
of the university machines of the present day” (374). Perhaps more clearly stated, by failing to
acknowledge the purpose and value of expressionism in the classroom, students
are unable to fully understand the connection between writing and themselves.
As Kinneavy notes, the formation of phenomenology is a result of the conflict between empiricist and idealism schools of philosophy
(375). More importantly however, it acts
to explain the nature and being of the self in addition to the role of the self
among others, thus effectively smoothing the gap between both schools. In terms of writing, this enables speakers to
not only express themselves, but also acknowledge a greater world outside of
their selves.
I found myself most interested by the
discussion of the three dimensions the self is composed of; the Being-for-Itself,
the Being-for-Others, and the Being-in-the-World. These three dimensions mark the
development, epistemology, and awareness of the self that individuals undergo
in order to form their view of the world.
Additionally, these three dimensions have a distinctive element of time
connected to them that is reflective of intellectual and personal
development. We often have our students
reflect on their progression as a writer, but we don’t ask them to reflect
enough on their three dimensions of being.
Another interesting
point in this particular selection is Kinneavy’s connection between
expressionism and the realization of “the presence of a goal to be achieved”(
379). To know of a goal is to provide
motivation to act, and to act with others to achieve goals and projects. With
this in mind, expression can certainly assist students with “doing more” with
writing. “Doing more” with writing has
been one of my primary occupations with teaching so far, as I believe that
writing is very much a purposeful act grounded in social interactions (as I’m
sure everyone else does). This semester
for example, I decided to do a proposal unit in order to demonstrate to my
students that writing is in fact an active act that delivers real world change.
Language,
as the ultimate act of expression and tool through which the three dimensions
are realized, is also a source of freedom and therefore choice. It is not a
surprise then, that Kinneavy connects Sartre’s principles of love and
reciprocity with rhetorical principles.
No comments:
Post a Comment